Tuesday 18th August

Why Queen Elizabeth II is NOT the Queen of England

You may wonder why www.splspro.com hold the opinions and values that we do and why we hold contempt for the Establishment and why we have formed our Sovereign Republic of Nu Brition, here is one excessively big reason as to why we must and  have  moved into the private and back into Grace with the Creator and claimed our riteful individual sovereignty, an insight into the mass deception that has been afoot right under our noses for hundreds of years!

Why Queen Elizabeth II is NOT the Queen of England

QUEEN ELIZABETH II has led the Royal Family for 67 years in 2020 and is the longest-reigning monarch in British history. Millions of people may be addressing her by the wrong title, however.

Queen Elizabeth II will celebrate her 67th year on the throne and 94th birthday in 2020, as she extends her lead as Britain’s longest-serving monarch. Despite her longevity, many people may be misusing her title.

Is Queen Elizabeth II the Queen of England?

Millions of people may have misused Queen Elizabeth II’s title for generations.

The monarch is commonly referred to as the “Queen of England”, given her most famous residence of Buckingham Palace.

However, the Queen cannot rule over England as a specific region, as it does not exist as a “sovereign state”.

Sovereign states are areas which exist under the representation of a centralised government.  in this case, that means Great Britain.

Remember initiates the United Kingdom of Great Britain exists solely as a paper based format, it is not representative to our land mass or country!!

England has not existed as a sovereign state since 1707 when Great Britain formed under the Acts of Union.

Therefore, the Queen’s official title is Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Before the Act of Union, the title of the Monarch was the King or Queen of England and Scotland and Ireland.

The Act of Union dropped England and Scotland’s status as sovereign states dropped, and they became separate states within the sovereign United Kingdom.

The Queen has more than just the one title, however, as she has taken on both official and unofficial monikers during her time as monarch.

Her full, unabridged title is Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.

Variations of this title have cropped up across the Commonwealth realms, but they follow roughly the same naming schedule.

However, in some countries, she has titles given to her by the resident natives.

In Jamaican Patois, she is known as Missis Queen or The Queen Lady, while in the Canadian Salish Nation she is Mother of all People.

She is also affectionately termed White Heron in New Zealand, where the Maori people named her after their resident sacred bird.

Countries where she no longer serves as head of state continue to call treat her with reverence as well, as she is known in Fiji, which abolished their monarchy in 1987, as Tui Viti – Paramount Chief.

The title is wholly honorary, however, and not recognised by the Fijian government.

With her collection of titles comes an extensive sphere of influence which allows the Queen to control the naming rights of her family members.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry were recently on the receiving end of the Queen’s strict naming conventions, as they work to secure independence from The Firm.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex hoped to keep hold of the Sussex Royal brand, but the Queen has prohibited them from carrying the name with them.

She said usage of the title was “untenable”, and the couple announced they would no longer use the “royal” aspect of their name from spring 2020.

source

Bear in mind that England does not have a constitutional monarch because the constitution was usurped in 1688 whereby the Coronation Oath was changed and created in statute form, the first time in its history, as had the King swear to abide by the “statutes in parliament” not the laws and customs of the people. Also the Bill of Rights usurped the Royal Prerogative so that the King could not prevent government legislation from becoming law “without consent of parliament”….therefore we have no head of the church of England as Rome has yet again succeeded in overthrowing our ancient laws and customs and Christian church….which is exactly what the EU is….Roman law.

T.H.E.Y. Thee Hierarchy Enslaving Yew – must sea 2021 –

 

Wombman’s un-a-lien-able rights are not given by government and neither are they via legislation put upon paper. Rights art not to be read / red my Souverän Sov’rein’deer(s) 🤣🤗🙏👑💜 As an officer may try to Act out in the course of their legal duties…pah

Hither at spl’s we know exactly what our un a lien able inherent God given rights art.

Remember one of thee legal maxim’$   IN COMMERCE FOR ANY MATTER TO BE RESOLVED MUST BE EXPRESSED. (Heb. 4:16; Phil. 4:6; Eph. 6:19-21).

No one is a mind reader. You have to put your position out there, you have to state what the issue is, to have someone to talk about and resolve. Legal Maxim: “He who fails to assert his rights has none.)

Fcuk that pile O’horse $hite.. Right on..👑💯 pass the Cutchie pon thee left hand side… 👊🙉🙈🙊🤣🤗🙏👑💯😁 bless up.

She (kween) QE2 has promised and swore to govern the people according to their laws and customs.

These customs include the Declaration of Right and the Bill of Rights.

The laws and customs referred to here are not the peoples, only the creator can give us our rights, it is his creation.

Now, by registering on the electoral roll, we have a new creator and we have turned our back on the old one by having a persona, and the laws and customs become those, not of the people but of the new creators, has the kween been honourable, and kept clean hands with her promise? Halsbury’s Laws of England that no MAGISTRATE or COUNTY COURT should exist, and when someone is summoned it is an ADMINISTRATIVE meeting without ANY lawful existence.

If this has transpired it is a breach of the Fraud Act 2006 as the judge/Magistrate, Clerk and Prosecutor step outside their lawful remit, and become personally liable. and if there’s still someone in the court to hear you you can then throw Halsbury’s Laws of England’s definition of an administrative court at them which reads.

The law is absolutely clear on this subject. NO administrative courts has any authority in this country and no government Act can be passed to legitimise them because of the constitutional restraints placed upon her Majesty at Her coronation.

The collection of revenue by such means is extortion, and extortion has been found reprehensible since ancient times. Separation of powers Today, in the year of print of dictionary your reading from, we find for example, that in the council tax regulations, the billing authority, the prosecuting authority and the enforcement authority are all vested in the same body.

The same bodies even purport to issue their own legal documents, by tacit agreement with the Courts. In our system of Common Law, the rule of law demands that we have a separation of powers. Today, the powers are not separated.

The executive is not a distinct, free-standing leg of the tripod. The executive now emerges directly from within the elected Chamber of the legislature where previously it emanated directly from the Monarch. That leads to constitutional confusion—because the executive has seized and misuses Parliament’s democratic credentials for its own, destructive, purposes.

Fortunately, we have something to which we can turn to preserve our ancient laws and freedoms. We have the Oath that Her Majesty The Queen took at her coronation by which she is solemnly bound and from which no one in England, Wales and Scotland has released her.

At Her Coronation the Queen swore to govern us, “according to [our] respective laws and customs”. Certainly, among our reputed “customs”, is precisely that invaluable and widely admired tripartite division of the powers.

The judiciary is part and parcel of our customary system of internal sovereignty—“the Queen in Parliament”. It is one of the three separate but symbiotic powers, and it is a capricious and self-serving contention that it should not have the power to preserve the authority of the legislature over the executive. It is a constitutional principle that the assent of the Queen & Parliament is prerequisite to the establishment of a Court which can operate a system of administrative law in Her Majesty’s Courts in England.

This was confirmed by Lord Denning during the debates on the European Communities Amendment Bill, HL Deb 08 October 1986 vol 480 cc246-95 246 at 250: “There is our judicial system deriving from the Crown as the source and fountain of justice. No court can be set up in England, no court can exist in England, except by the authority of the Queen and Parliament. That has been so ever since the Bill of Rights.”

The trick is to distinguish within the Bible when the law is of nature and God and when it is of man acting as god and vicar. Many or most of the mentions of “god” and “lord” in the Bible refer to the kings who claim to rule as God on Earth in Christ’s departure (until His return).

The Bible switches between capitalized God and little god; Lord and lord.) Save – To except, reserve, or exempt; as where a statute “saves” vested rights. To toll/poll, or suspend the running or operation of; as to “save” the statute of limitations.

(Note: To be saved is to stop acting or “impersonating” something else that is not under God (in nature).

To cease to be an artificial person is saving yourself and acting under God and nature again (becoming a “christian”).

In religion, they will tell you that you can be saved and still be a citizen (fiction/person). Religion seeks to control you through fiction under the doctrine of “law of the land”. Government is religion. This doctrine is contrary to the nature of life itself (a person is not natural), thus by default is contrary to “God”.

Either save yourself under God or remain a debtor person subject to man. Again, you cannot serve two masters. You must choose between God and mammon. To be “born again” is to quit using your artificial person and be reborn into this life on Earth, that’s all.) to use a legal name, is legal fraud explained ❤ civilly dead and inactive, no longer a volunteer, unto equitable realms and, a long way from where broseph, john of thee harris family left us, R.I.P a great man. ❤ remember the prince of peace and the king of kings, is…..?

Much love, Guv.